From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on dcvr.yhbt.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS6939 64.71.128.0/18
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
 FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER shortcircuit=no autolearn=no
 version=3.3.2
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: 375gnu <375gnu@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.ruby.kgio.general
Subject: Re: kgio test_signal_close failed
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 21:56:04 +0300
Message-ID:
 <CAAB-Kcn9cUY7GMR9m41JDU+3b4QZUwLqPs5xTP1N7CpDJU+xqQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:
 <CAAB-KcmUwrm6_QvaiYA7LG3ES=Ro8zET4QM_Sb7nvVRpzwtShQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120304191752.GA30236@dcvr.yhbt.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1330974302 6457 80.91.229.3 (5 Mar 2012 19:05:02
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 19:05:02 +0000 (UTC)
To: kgio@librelist.org
Original-X-From: kgio@librelist.org Mon Mar 05 20:05:01 2012
Return-path: <kgio@librelist.org>
Envelope-to: gclrkg-kgio@m.gmane.org
List-Archive: <http://librelist.com/archives/kgio/>
List-Help: <http://librelist.com/help.html>
List-Id: <kgio-public@bogomips.org>
List-Post: <mailto:kgio@librelist.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:kgio-subscribe@librelist.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:kgio-unsubscribe@librelist.com>
Precedence: list
Original-Sender: kgio@librelist.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.ruby.kgio.general:89
Archived-At:
 <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.ruby.kgio.general/89>
Received: from zedshaw.xen.prgmr.com ([64.71.167.205]) by plane.gmane.org
 with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <kgio@librelist.org>) id
 1S4dDO-00088v-ST for gclrkg-kgio@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 20:04:59 +0100
Received: from zedshaw.xen.prgmr.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by
 zedshaw.xen.prgmr.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A20721D44D for
 <gclrkg-kgio@m.gmane.org>; Mon,  5 Mar 2012 19:10:49 +0000 (UTC)

On 3/4/12, Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
> 375gnu <375gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sometimes test_signal_close from test_poll.rb fails. Not every time, and
>> only
>> with ruby1.9 (1.9.3.0 is my current version). With ruby 1.8.7 it's passed.
> Is this also on Debian/kfreebsd?

Not (0 of 25 times). But it runs in kvm, so it's much slower than real linux
box (110 sec for all tests vs. 75).

>>     59:     thr = Thread.new { sleep 0.100; Process.kill(:USR1, $$) }
>
> Does increasing the sleep time there help?  It's a potential race
> condition :/


No, even with "sleep 2" (1 of 10 is failed)

-- 
https://375gnu.wordpress.com/
https://launchpad.net/~375gnu/+archive/ppa