From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-ASN: AS33070 50.56.128.0/17 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RDNS_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=no version=3.3.2 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alexandre Riveira Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.ruby.rainbows.general Subject: Re: c10k paradigm Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:11:08 +0000 Message-ID: <516D6A0C.50406@objectdata.com.br> References: <516BE872.5060006@objectdata.com.br> <20130415183011.GA27317@dcvr.yhbt.net> <516C2A48.3070808@objectdata.com.br> <20130415193403.GA742@dcvr.yhbt.net> <516D338C.9060408@objectdata.com.br> <20130416172417.GA12658@dcvr.yhbt.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1366135876 21006 80.91.229.3 (16 Apr 2013 18:11:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 18:11:16 +0000 (UTC) To: "Rainbows! list" Original-X-From: rainbows-talk-bounces-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org Tue Apr 16 20:11:20 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclrrg-rainbows-talk@m.gmane.org X-Original-To: rainbows-talk-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org Delivered-To: rainbows-talk-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=ap1yGDPEg3j7oyD5yitMLAamtj59Q+pwzwuHsF3M0ZY=; b=k0zn79SbI/gAzefmCk5GFTxv/0tPA0M/Bl1IsTMT66tX8VYL1WhXVRsq2gnSkOXTSx A1Wiv5enMeO8kfbiWyayEFVEz7MOd43EEEbfZUNWLbpj71jKe1J++DZ+LImzNe0c71rZ nZdSaTZAWdp1pikzkZsvdOFecUesOnC5oosKp0f9hotrcYvx6AsMzuugFTcjvMzgbRQx Zp6YJpgzN6ytNJuHfolhTxbd271Qcq61olWTPDOjmscazTcRvWyUFDdrmtHg8AyLKvrw 47yT0tzavz8oqFSBB2sEyNGBdagMkWnz6aBo2047kXhOHQjNpbJ68Gs29NB/lNiydp1z L/qQ== X-Received: by 10.236.54.202 with SMTP id i50mr1619840yhc.30.1366135873201; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:11:13 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 In-Reply-To: <20130416172417.GA12658-yBiyF41qdooeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlQd2YOu4k7b3tdRhbiWhwaXwhULJBwiaAFbdDo4z4HVF490BAT+aBWLjql9L9lk3Rvh3RF X-BeenThere: rainbows-talk-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: rainbows-talk-bounces-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org Errors-To: rainbows-talk-bounces-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org X-Broken-Reverse-DNS: no host name found for IP address 50.56.192.79 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.ruby.rainbows.general:473 Archived-At: Received: from [50.56.192.79] (helo=rubyforge.org) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1USALd-0000D6-Gu for gclrrg-rainbows-talk@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:11:17 +0200 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8414A2E126; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 18:11:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-f47.google.com (mail-yh0-f47.google.com [209.85.213.47]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC7C2E122 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 18:11:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f47.google.com with SMTP id z12so106896yhz.34 for ; Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:11:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.74] ([189.78.153.40]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v57sm3473633yhn.19.2013.04.16.11.11.11 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:11:12 -0700 (PDT) > "lock slowness" - which version of Ruby is this? ruby 1.9.3p385 (2013-02-06 revision 39114) [i686-linux] > > Did you modify your app to use app.deferred? + TryDefer as I pointed > you to in the other message? > >> Could it be that the controllers of the rails would run without >> party pool threads only with EventMachine (C10K) while others >> would use the controller with EventMachine thread pool (erp)? > That should allow some rails controllers to use threads > (app.deferred? => true) while others do not use threads > (app.deferred? => false). Keep in mind this is not a very common > configuration, so not many people have experience with it in > production. Your suggestion seems to be better, but I'm sorry I did not understand where I put this method, the controller would be as below? class HomeController < ApplicationController def deferred? true end end Tanks Alexandre Riveira _______________________________________________ Rainbows! mailing list - rainbows-talk-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rainbows-talk Do not quote signatures (like this one) or top post when replying