From: ghazel-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
To: "Rainbows! list" <rainbows-talk-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: defaulting all concurrency models to 50 connections?
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:07:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimLcRQxg+LLDvhKXEG+jOqSAECwLw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110425234044.GA21884-yBiyF41qdooeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
I'm testing with ThreadSpawn at 100 workers on REE 1.8.7, but I by no
means hit anywhere near that number of actual simultaneous
connections.
-Greg
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
> I figure the defaults for Rainbows! sucks badly for everyone anyways,
> maybe it's just easier to make ThreadPool, ThreadSpawn,
> WriterThreadPool, and WriterThreadSpawn use the same defaults as
> everyone else. It'd still suck, but at least it'd suck more
> consistently :)
>
> I suspect people are most likely to be quietly experimenting with
> ThreadSpawn/ThreadPool since they're the most conservative of the
> available options (besides Base), but is anybody relying on the low (30,
> 20 respectively) defaults?
>
> (You don't have to say where you're testing/experimenting with it and I
> don't care if you use a fake name or not)
>
> I'm not sure about the cost of native threads on other platforms, but
> NPTL on Linux is pretty cheap with MRI 1.9, especially if you're on
> 64-bit.
>
> --
> Eric Wong
> _______________________________________________
> Rainbows! mailing list - rainbows-talk@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rainbows-talk
> Do not quote signatures (like this one) or top post when replying
>
_______________________________________________
Rainbows! mailing list - rainbows-talk@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rainbows-talk
Do not quote signatures (like this one) or top post when replying
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-26 1:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-25 23:40 defaulting all concurrency models to 50 connections? Eric Wong
[not found] ` <20110425234044.GA21884-yBiyF41qdooeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2011-04-26 1:07 ` ghazel-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://yhbt.net/rainbows/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTimLcRQxg+LLDvhKXEG+jOqSAECwLw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ghazel-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rainbows-talk-GrnCvJ7WPxnNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://yhbt.net/rainbows.git/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).