From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS6939 64.71.128.0/18 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER shortcircuit=no autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Wong Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.ruby.posix-mq.general Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add a sleep in alarm test in current Ruby. Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:46:40 +0000 Message-ID: <20120712194640.GA24857@dcvr.yhbt.net> References: <1341346430-8113-1-git-send-email-375GNU@Gmail.COM> <1341346430-8113-3-git-send-email-375GNU@Gmail.COM> <20120704002017.GA14457@dcvr.yhbt.net> <20120712080922.GA22717@dcvr.yhbt.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1342122412 30545 80.91.229.3 (12 Jul 2012 19:46:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:46:52 +0000 (UTC) To: ruby.posix.mq@librelist.com Original-X-From: ruby.posix.mq@librelist.com Thu Jul 12 21:46:51 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gclrpg-ruby.posix.mq@m.gmane.org List-Archive: List-Help: List-Id: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Original-Sender: ruby.posix.mq@librelist.com Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.lang.ruby.posix-mq.general:112 Archived-At: Received: from zedshaw.xen.prgmr.com ([64.71.167.205]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SpPLe-0004jy-Pc for gclrpg-ruby.posix.mq@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 21:46:50 +0200 Received: from zedshaw.xen.prgmr.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by zedshaw.xen.prgmr.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464B121E1EE for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:55:44 +0000 (UTC) Hleb Valoshka <375gnu@gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/12/12, Eric Wong wrote: > > >> I've filed an issue: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6725 > > Bug report is rejected with the following explanation: "Asynchronous signals may > not dealt with in the order you expect." True, I don't disagree with upstream... Signal handlers are tricky :<