From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, URIBL_BLOCKED shortcircuit=no autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 X-Original-To: unicorn-public@bogomips.org Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA4161FACE for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 09:57:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id hq12so6730745vcb.27 for ; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 01:57:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.250.198 with SMTP id mp6mr2325514vcb.19.1417600635261; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 01:57:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.31.177.4 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Dec 2014 01:57:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 20:57:15 +1100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: No, passenger 5.0 is not faster than unicorn :) From: Sam Saffron To: =?UTF-8?Q?Br=C3=A1ulio_Bhavamitra?= Cc: unicorn-public , Hitendra Hugo Melo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: oops sent wrong link meant to send this https://meta.discourse.org/t/raptor-web-server/21304/6 On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Sam Saffron wrote: > I covered this here: > http://discuss.topazlabs.com/t/amidst-blizzards-they-rest/1147 > > it seems like an odd marketing move to me ... optimising a bit that > needs very little help. heck ripping out hashie and the 50 frames > omniauth injects would have a significantly bigger impact on rails > apps out there than optimising the 0.5% that needs little optimising. > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Br=C3=A1ulio Bhavamitra wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> I've just tested a one instance each (one worker with unicorn and >> --max-pool-size 1 passenger 5) on the rails app I work. >> >> And the results are just as I expected, no miracle at all: Unicorn is >> still the fatest! >> (the difference is only a few milliseconds less per request) >> >> The blocking design of unicorn is proving itself very efficient. >> >> cheers! >> br=C3=A1ulio >>