From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,URIBL_BLOCKED shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Original-To: unicorn-public@bogomips.org Received: from mail-qg0-f49.google.com (mail-qg0-f49.google.com [209.85.192.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 234741F420 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 19:03:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id j107so124833qga.8 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:03:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=D+yzbSmYZnLc2W7vacKg1wqjWbN1AziTQRKOxkwkYio=; b=le6wLSJP3/gWUu7xjw9VoEeie1pqenvR521ICRZzx3QcwXsZt7+A8jjnvQScNCpkn5 g6hBnNW0nEHYJPHSz6XbNOBItuc2EQYfcrCGHzc1Zlt88U6gyWTl1plVCWN+S3yDVDqb lx5Au8SqIqIS7PGVLaDDAhBz/A1b+h8/uhGz0fj9Lz7sSknQp3ffzRRo8ZYmGWLMVn4L p4Q6liyctYstQDKt5l9uDqMmMsKhcsD55x2vNW42UX0jfNz5ZUv3rLeUie4ZXsq6I1sr 9P9xiyU9nZN+wWDyjD+3ZTfktxNwg3ohTdhXG9envUGbwkPlBMrkxp2yKz0eUI5qyuWX 8vqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkfw2DAekOiKtXUsDhiKoAFIB9YWc0dClqx3XTM4Wt6WPLHldZrnvCwbayYYGPDvi5jRyqI MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.134.201 with SMTP id k9mr59134737qat.59.1406055819257; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:03:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.47.147 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:03:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:03:39 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: High number of TCP retransmits on Solaris From: Paul Henry To: Michael Fischer Cc: unicorn-public Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: PublicInbox::Filter 0.0.1 List-Id: We're seeing these retransmits on the client, which is key I guess. The benchmark script is entirely sequential, so theoretically, it should be able to keep up? Paul On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Michael Fischer wrote: > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Paul Henry wrote: > > When using unicorn unicorn v4.8.2, we're seeing a high number of TCP >> retransmits at a high connection rate. > > > If you're seeing TCP retransmits on the server, it means your benchmark > client can't keep up with Unicorn's responses. > > --Michael >