From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from mx1.dfw.automattic.com (mx1.dfw.automattic.com [192.0.84.151]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84C8D1F4B4 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 19:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dfw.automattic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14EC31C1E86 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 19:28:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=automattic.com; h=content-type:content-type:subject:subject:message-id:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:received :received:received:received:received; s=automattic1; t= 1611602881; bh=jowfjTZYVJ1n28WW8c6f2d+pVf1iIDIQ7Md/0YP33fI=; b=X 0yY5gBDYCOJ5KRNqnHjJ2tjj5rhwubro8Wp738MhyCPNQJP9sh8AOFeYB8BgQnhS Cw8gVPqKjC3OKAR+nU7c4V4SXtjD+gOLAAK7p+SLhAWxbbQsSDrHclcSZZ2/MDfQ oKvyw4S47Xn9YU/M6CpSNg+uDSY5a4efS0AKLL2i8e7Me+6ASvaa5J8KmqGQb35b /dFmPww+9V+MQEe1JjUbZlaqSmKIpEusidWiTVTxPOCRxLtggVBmCwyDo+pWIjl+ ZNP0WGwlnexR1NnKH2Bukv1SDdXgYOZxPeGtWATdYDm4TrZx0CnGkCEgenHvWSXC 6Sc8Y409NcXeodbUFk9bA== X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at wordpress.com Received: from mx1.dfw.automattic.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.dfw.automattic.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SYm0tK-A1OOY for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 19:28:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-gw.dfw.automattic.com (smtp-gw.dfw.automattic.com [192.0.95.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.dfw.automattic.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B99F11C1D0B for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 19:28:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.automattic.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=automattic.com header.i=@automattic.com header.b="XzATs+Z/"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=a8c-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@a8c-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="z7emNMDI"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from smtp-gw.dfw.automattic.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-gw.dfw.automattic.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A35DB2206E for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 19:28:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=automattic.com; s=automattic1; t=1611602881; bh=jowfjTZYVJ1n28WW8c6f2d+pVf1iIDIQ7Md/0YP33fI=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=XzATs+Z/8r5/HzOCA4WFUL6MdP+n8T/nJCo8iia4pSSuNyq3VjmBl7kskv/vteclj LDqzBhu8X0j/EM/S/QUkYsIL+qt9OYHZ3F/fpPRPAlTOYb6HC1FGu3NpCxKsTu2q+Y qzMdrBFQZN7wQ+v7nbrbOqLpUK17jSCy/yqiTTHw6bB1SmMZFxj6ySo0yGw1vHzpeW sv1gbDStY7dDZqRtzLbYjUR7y9xopmSvd82zKno/LMKjCr7KK4s9Np1jlv8uHVQ2Sv fo3z/8qlZ/SQZ1yVZML8oWrmAp6zuTFS/vB8Pim54k1pR5cDzdnMUjMtQanvZlNysh vPHU00LIbEMTA== Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-gw.dfw.automattic.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9821121C16 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 19:28:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id d9so407124wmd.5 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:28:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=a8c-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AZEk4ymM5YtCr5LGMP7VUa6Vp1rgGDACTuBPQNIPAJ4=; b=z7emNMDIjsmw7rPry071rbaG/qFo6UhpG63N4rLXEJZMpl7/qr/QYFwKWbfPNaJcLz iAQCi9wGX94/ghLWgY8lSR4LgEtk79HMgqdEq3vj6W13/mRbuV3KdjgSzzNYTJl/uQ18 tGN+NFCj5nhZX7ABW86dcCJF2BUpyiZ5SP65SWdFiKWM9tLiXB9SNyp2nGRSfRJQfo8j D8wf/PgOY5TfqcjwsH3OCLX2blriMGpEeM2HJyLC1opzEDh+eW/TTYlOCstCB/L/4pmB ZnJRsZJpgqauJpm9m9lnPdOFSxReELYUtA5U3zcfiMU7WJzNtNq9RJYb/rLl8vBs8z+4 QhGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AZEk4ymM5YtCr5LGMP7VUa6Vp1rgGDACTuBPQNIPAJ4=; b=pg0thEgog1IdenFrdMwjQbQp360BGKgK5NUX+4RYoQevPvWS7M6IKtyqXNqVawd5Zv 8Ou4S4Gb6vQkuRSNfZHZBYgkE/mBopfIrd4LmXG1l3aqOrEWqEaxhtUoeH4/ico+6yHJ hfjgpmqeO9vMOEZ49o+074gmcp43BUrxU1Tv2/PRkgebog9DFRr6mYmkALL/XlTkCZ5k 2Xg9BfZTY8EN2KPngioLiVOVILcrGklx3XRgiFMcVeDsiD56aTRTORJ35eaEzgIgtZJo TivqWKoqMmi24Fa4crodWCu/iuFbu8ixRMpfz2NWeXDlEgJig7exj2DnkLUfeeC7012/ JJ7A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5301cyK27U3Jt3A+I4p+1xju+pWDbiGjk6bAUSmUkcL/Wy2y51V6 jp70+Rc06iKPAllBzuQnqgvawz8dG8zk212v4JgbXmRVO7PIynOHFX3ZrAkKfqw8aRg8/Y/AaCa yNJZtLZlDB9RGSpOw7A7b0b4LQCI1f1BN6lgh6w== X-Received: by 2002:adf:8464:: with SMTP id 91mr2567575wrf.188.1611602880448; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:28:00 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxh7fGaF21eKW9Zy4in1gq6HknaGJMZvR6+PG/VAPmPpOftexDVOolY6K50R21NGNXlMb7kTXg6TRL1rlsHPZM= X-Received: by 2002:adf:8464:: with SMTP id 91mr2567556wrf.188.1611602880123; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 11:28:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210111212621.GA12555@dcvr> <20210117095109.GA28219@dcvr> <20210120085745.GB29704@dcvr> <20210120212229.GA25024@dcvr> <20210125174755.GA30378@dcvr> In-Reply-To: <20210125174755.GA30378@dcvr> From: Xiao Yu Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 19:27:46 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Segfaults on http_close? To: Eric Wong Cc: Xiao Yu , Arkadi Colson , cmogstored-public@yhbt.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-Id: On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 5:47 PM Eric Wong wrote: > > No problem and thanks for the update! Any thoughts on whether I > should release 1.8.1 with the patch soon or maybe wait a bit longer? Let's wait a week, I think it's pretty safe because across the cluster we were seeing ~1 segfault / day and so far none of the nodes have experienced any issues. However I just want to be sure it's not due to random chance and give it a couple more days of full weekday load to be sure.