From 50e91f1ac0cdbd6da85f298b0e29c94018b5b989 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Wong Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 20:27:00 +0000 Subject: doc: Static_Files: remove Future section sendfile(2) is fewer syscalls and FDs than splice(2), and an open-file-cache is unlikely to be worth the complexity. --- Static_Files | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/Static_Files b/Static_Files index bbc47a8..e2aa622 100644 --- a/Static_Files +++ b/Static_Files @@ -61,11 +61,3 @@ With large files and high-throughput clients, there should be little performance difference compared to optimal C implementation such as nginx and lighttpd. Ruby runtime overhead matters more when serving slower clients and smaller files. - -== The Future... - -We'll also support an open file cache (similar to nginx) which -allows us to reuse open file descriptors. - -Under Linux, we'll support the splice(2) system call for zero-copy -proxying {io_splice}[http://bogomips.org/ruby_io_splice/], too. -- cgit v1.2.3-24-ge0c7