raindrops RubyGem user+dev discussion/patches/pulls/bugs/help
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
To: Simon Eskildsen <simon.eskildsen@shopify.com>
Cc: unicorn-public@bogomips.org, raindrops-public@bogomips.org
Subject: Re: check_client_connection using getsockopt(2)
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 01:42:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170223014223.GA15864@starla> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO3HKM7m7_9Fr6N8Wobqb3nqKCwJt4rxog=1ZLv_LraYeR9FUw@mail.gmail.com>

Simon Eskildsen <simon.eskildsen@shopify.com> wrote:

<snip> Thanks for the writeup!

Another sidenote: It seems nginx <-> unicorn is a bit odd
for deployment in a containerized environment(*).

> I meant to ask, in Raindrops why do you use the netlink API to get the
> socket backlog instead of `getsockopt(2)` with `TCP_INFO` to get
> `tcpi_unacked`? (as described in
> http://www.ryanfrantz.com/posts/apache-tcp-backlog/) We use this to
> monitor socket backlogs with a sidekick Ruby daemon. Although we're
> looking to replace it with a middleware to simplify for Kubernetes.
> It's one of our main metrics for monitoring performance, especially
> around deploys.

The netlink API allows independently-spawned processes to
monitor others; so it can be system-wide.  TCP_INFO requires the
process doing the checking to also have the socket open.

I guess this reasoning for using netlink is invalid for containers,
though...

> I was going to use `env["unicorn.socket"]`/`env["puma.socket"]`, but
> you could also do `env.delete("hijack_io")` after hijacking to allow
> Unicorn to still render the response. Unfortunately the
> `<webserver>.socket` key is not part of the Rack standard, so I'm
> hesitant to use it. When this gets into Unicorn I'm planning to
> propose it upstream to Puma as well.

I was going to say env.delete("rack.hijack_io") is dangerous
(since env could be copied by middleware); but apparently not:
rack.hijack won't work with a copied env, either.
You only need to delete with the same env object you call
rack.hijack with.

But calling rack.hijack followed by env.delete may still
have unintended side-effects in other servers; so I guess
we (again) cannot rely on hijack working portably.

> Cool. How would you suggest I check for TCP_INFO compatible platforms
> in Unicorn? Is `RUBY_PLATFORM.ends_with?("linux".freeze)` sufficient
> or do you prefer another mechanism? I agree that we should fall back
> to the write hack on other platforms.

The Raindrops::TCP_Info class should be undefined on unsupported
platforms, so I think you can check for that, instead.  Then it
should be transparent to add FreeBSD support from unicorn's
perspective.


(*) So I've been wondering if adding a "unicorn-mode" to an
    existing C10K, slow-client-capable Ruby/Rack server +
    reverse proxy makes sense for containerized deploys.
    Maybe...

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-23  1:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAO3HKM49+aLD=KLij3zhJqkWnR7bCWVan0mOvxD85xfrW8RXOw@mail.gmail.com>
2017-02-22 18:33 ` check_client_connection using getsockopt(2) Eric Wong
2017-02-22 20:09   ` Simon Eskildsen
2017-02-23  1:42     ` Eric Wong [this message]
2017-02-23  2:42       ` Simon Eskildsen
2017-02-23  3:52         ` Eric Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://yhbt.net/raindrops/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170223014223.GA15864@starla \
    --to=e@80x24.org \
    --cc=raindrops-public@bogomips.org \
    --cc=simon.eskildsen@shopify.com \
    --cc=unicorn-public@bogomips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://yhbt.net/raindrops.git/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).