From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <death@junki.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS49160 62.122.208.0/22
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from junki.org (junki.org [62.122.209.15])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4933820229
	for <unicorn-public@bogomips.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 21:03:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by junki.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 5D8B6E092; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:03:11 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from msd.home (msd.home [10.0.0.100])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by junki.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A2CA4E08B;
	Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:03:10 +0300 (MSK)
Message-ID: <1476997390.1736.170.camel@junki.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add some tolerance (RFC2616 sec. 19.3)
From: Mishael A Sibiryakov <death@junki.org>
To: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
Cc: unicorn-public@bogomips.org
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:03:10 +0300
In-Reply-To: <20161020205052.GA30292@starla>
References: <1476954332.1736.156.camel@junki.org>
	 <20161020175554.GA15564@starla> <1476995156.1736.166.camel@junki.org>
	 <20161020205052.GA30292@starla>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4
List-Id: <unicorn-public@bogomips.org>

On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 20:50 +0000, Eric Wong wrote:

> > > > +  def test_multiline_header_0d0a
> > > > +    parser = HttpParser.new
> > > > +    parser.buf << "GET / HTTP/1.0\r\nX-Multiline-Header: foo
> > > > bar\r\n\tcha cha\r\n\tzha zha\r\n\r\n"
> > > 
> > > I expect code to be wrapped at 80 lines or less.  Fixed locally.
> > > (I need big fonts, even 80 is a compromise, I really prefer 64)
> > 
> > Line 221 with "ssl bullshit" guided me to this.
> 
> Ah, that's an old test from Mongrel, probably not worth fixing;
> just trying to keep new code cleaner.

It's a good desire :) I'll comply next time.