From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS33070 50.56.128.0/17 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL shortcircuit=no autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 X-Original-To: archivist@yhbt.net Delivered-To: archivist@dcvr.yhbt.net Received: from rubyforge.org (50-56-192-79.static.cloud-ips.com [50.56.192.79]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246D033D87 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:41:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 050182E076; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:41:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: mongrel-unicorn@rubyforge.org Delivered-To: mongrel-unicorn@rubyforge.org Received: from dcvr.yhbt.net (dcvr.yhbt.net [64.71.152.64]) by rubyforge.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5234F2E074 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:41:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8DF33D83; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:41:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:41:01 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: unicorn list Subject: Re: Combating nginx 499 HTTP responses during flash traffic scenario Message-ID: <20121029194101.GA10907@dcvr.yhbt.net> References: <20121029184549.GA9690@dcvr.yhbt.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-BeenThere: mongrel-unicorn@rubyforge.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: mongrel-unicorn-bounces@rubyforge.org Errors-To: mongrel-unicorn-bounces@rubyforge.org Hongli Lai wrote: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Eric Wong wrote: > >> Any input would be appreciated. > > > > I'd love to hear back on how you eventually solve this, too :> > > Does haproxy support removing clients from the queue like this? I'm not sure, Tom can investigate further. I do recall haproxy having more intelligent load distribution than nginx, so it can send requests to less-busy machines, at least. _______________________________________________ Unicorn mailing list - mongrel-unicorn@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-unicorn Do not quote signatures (like this one) or top post when replying