From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 shortcircuit=no autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 X-Original-To: unicorn-public@bogomips.org Received: from latitanza.investici.org (latitanza.investici.org [82.94.249.234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1B922007E for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 04:56:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.94.249.234] (latitanza [82.94.249.234]) (Authenticated sender: praveen@autistici.org) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C09D120695; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 04:56:39 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Request to follow SemVer/mention it in homepage To: Eric Wong References: <560A31F1.3060608@debian.org> <20150929073650.GA7434@dcvr.yhbt.net> <40CB6BDA-920D-44E1-B364-D7228248C747@debian.org> <20150929193627.GA7572@dcvr.yhbt.net> <560C07FD.9060208@debian.org> <20150930195142.GA23228@dcvr.yhbt.net> Cc: unicorn-public@bogomips.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Jonne_Ha=c3=9f?= From: Pirate Praveen Message-ID: <560CBCFB.6080102@debian.org> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 10:26:27 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150930195142.GA23228@dcvr.yhbt.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 [copying jhass, maintainer of diaspora] jhass, they prefer email to issue tracker so I copied you here. You can see the complete discussion here http://bogomips.org/unicorn-public/560A31F1.3060608%40debian.org/t/#u On Thursday 01 October 2015 01:21 AM, Eric Wong wrote: > Pirate Praveen wrote: >> Can you mention the recommended way of adding unicorn in a >> Gemfile in your home page? > > I'm not very knowledgeable about bundler, but app servers probably > should not be in any packaged Gemfile at all. May be jhass can explain the rationale for adding unicorn to Gemfile better. >> gitlab and diaspora has unicorn in their Gemfile, for a user they >> want gitlab or diaspora and they don't care if its using unicorn >> or puma or passenger. >> >> I need some kind of an official statement about compatibility >> which I can show to projects like gitlab and diaspora, so they >> don't insist on exact patch release of unicorn. I could patch the >> Gemfile, but that adds extra burden on me as a maintainer which >> I'd like to avoid if possible. > > "Official statements" do not have much weight behind them; history > does. > > They can look at the git history (especially that of manpages and > documentation) to see the only feature removals were for > undocumented cruft. jhass, can we relax unicorn dependency to ~> 4.9? > Personally, I intensely dislike "official" things; so people > shouldn't take what I (or anybody) writes as gospel. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWDLz7AAoJEM4fnGdFEsIqN5MQAKEWGiI3IBfOYmquIplkG/7E 5gohMKsCDJlj6lgqaPIHzvekIW7ssNlxKv9cmeA/v+uNNCKZw6OEw4dmkfJHq5VV mQ+bBCKkymTFR7ZrIWIs43D0E4To4Sf5LD6MpECiQI1MypFoy66rl0FqJR9PQcF0 nPqcI8LDEICePZwgPdeRrTrS4vCfr4U+BmQWuYovIjwAGEoslnNeblKE+q4LcnGu 09XWelo8eYL62EI6XB92KWCFx0isiEBGQK0PzLqZUbWz17Y7kNMxeAnfmPZQFoe5 4qI7SEtSusFU3OW2t6Eyj6/bh+hP7W2jtMnub+B+QBBUqjf50WV0p4FqUUXMzheS wDJbtVdYNbNO4f6cWLMVGC18jOVzJw86luc+QoxptTCShku+gFROrkA4w+ciHpNk 2x92Z/S2ejYZlJKGhH97KqMe2gAKgikwYk2zgjSLtpxxrAPiE2nP3tX5KKOG7BNO iUPdftzLD04oEr21QMb/gRpCEP0f8zsECK/vkpB4VjfjM9HhgEDJZzOfOTvHs04b avILU6iTUQkSMcWhtdp8bxsifhD+sSjhThWbbMyomV9LdjVBf9gf3J4pzTALT5Rf rc+V0Gf+dScHpSFMphY7Y7vKuS/PjKvLq1qD2rAsOtDVPDxVT99HsVTUUNR6lAY0 eHegzfNqE/oqHosK1dLN =AglS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----