Update respond_to? calls for second argument.

Rack (since v2) has started explicitly listing the second
(optional) argument for respond_to?, which matches the
underlying Ruby spec. This patch fixes the calls in both C
and Ruby approaches.

[ew: add test, use rb_obj_respond_to if available]

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/lib/clogger/pure.rb b/lib/clogger/pure.rb
index 77f81b4..fddfe79 100644
--- a/lib/clogger/pure.rb
+++ b/lib/clogger/pure.rb
@@ -77,8 +77,8 @@ class Clogger
     @logger.respond_to?(:fileno) ? @logger.fileno : nil
   end
 
-  def respond_to?(m)
-    :close == m.to_sym || @body.respond_to?(m)
+  def respond_to?(method, include_all=false)
+    :close == method.to_sym || @body.respond_to?(method, include_all)
   end
 
   def to_path